PHILOSOPHY 4360/5360 – METAPHYSICS Laws of Nature – Handout 2 Topic X. Laws of Nature: Realist Versus Reductionist Views Lewis-laws and Barry Loewer on Our Philosophical Expectations Concerning Laws of Nature
نویسنده
چکیده
Barry Loewer sets out a “list of the most important features that laws are supposed to have” – that is, a list of propositions formulating what are widely held to be necessary truths about laws – and then he argues that, while Lewislaws (L-laws) do not make all of those propositions true, they do a better job in this regard than any alternative account of the nature of laws. Does Loewer succeed in doing this? Let’s consider each of the propositions on Loewer’s list.
منابع مشابه
Are Miracles Violations of the Laws of Nature?
Classical theism holds that God rules the world not only indirectly, by the natural laws established with creation, but through actions or direct interventions that interfere with natural processes and human actions. These direct interventions are usually called miracles. Modern Western philosophy, at least starting from Spinoza and Hume, has defined miracles as “violations of the laws of natur...
متن کاملTwo Accounts of Laws and Time
for “Two Accounts of Laws and Time” Among the most important questions in the metaphysics of science are “What are the natures of fundamental laws and chances?” and “What grounds the direction of time? My aim in this paper is to examine some connections between these questions, discuss two approaches to answering them and argue in favor of one. Along the way I will raise and comment on a number...
متن کاملMinimal anti-Humeanism
I argue that there is a tension in our theorizing about laws of nature. We have powerful reasons to think that laws are not universal generalizations – if they are we would face the problem of explanatory circularity. But we have powerful reasons, stemming from our practice of using and reasoning with laws of nature, to think that laws are universal generalizations. I start by elucidating this ...
متن کاملMetaphysics of Laws of Nature
— ABSTRACT I argue that, because fundamental scientific theories are attempts to tell us something about reality, we are required to take into account the metaphysical features of those theories. I claim that a guarded realism is the proper stance to take toward fundamental scientific theories: philosophically, one must guard against accepting every posit at face value. Laws of nature are one o...
متن کاملCan Kantian Laws Be Broken?
In this paper I explore Kant’s critical discussions of the topic of miracles (including the important but neglected fragment from the 1780s called “On Miracles”) in an effort to answer the question in the title. Along the way I discuss some of the different kinds of “laws” in Kant’s system, and also the argument for his claim that, even if empirical miracles do occur, we will never be in a good...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011